Tsetse

Tsetse v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20213:18-cv-01876California973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 PRINCE F. TSETSE, No. C 18-1876 WHA (PR) 7 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO v. DISMISS; GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES; TO SHOW

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, CAUSE

10 Respondent. (Dkt. Nos. 52, 57) / 12 Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this habeas petition under 28 13 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction in state court. The original petition claimed 14 ineffective assistance of counsel, and subsequently petitioner received a stay to exhaust two 15 additional claims of prosecutorial misconduct and actual innocence. He exhausted those two 16 claims in a failed habeas petition to the California Supreme Court, and then he renewed his 17 Second Amended Petition (“SAP”) here, which included his three exhausted claims. 18 Respondent was ordered to filing an answer or a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.