Jones

Jones v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20215:20-cv-04345California920 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ANTONIO JONES, Case No. 20-cv-04345-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 28] Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Antonio Jones brings this purported class action complaint against Defendants Tracfone Wireless and 20/20 Communications, Inc., (collectively “Defendants”) for misclassifying him as an independent contractor, and Mr. Jones seeks compensation in the form of unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, and uncompensated meal and rest breaks. See Third Amend. Compl. (“TAC”), ECF 27. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. See Mot., ECF 28. Mr. Jones filed a brief in opposition. See Opp’n, ECF 33. For the following reasons, this motion is GRANTED. Defendants argue that all claims should be dismissed because Mr. Jones has failed to adequately plead an employment relationship with either Defendant. Mot. 6-8. The Court agrees. As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.