Iancu
Apple Inc. v. Iancu
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 APPLE INC., et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-06128-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. INTERVENE AND MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PRELIMINARY
ANDREI IANCU, INJUNCTION
11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 34
In this suit challenging a precedential rule adopted by the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), Proposed Plaintiffs-In-Intervention US Inventor, 360 Heros, Inc., Larry Golden, World Source Enterprises, LLC, Dareltech LLC, Tinnus Enterprises, Clearplay, Inc., and E-Watch, Inc. (collectively “Proposed Intervenors”) move the Court to intervene. The Proposed Intervenors request leave to intervene as of right, or for permissive intervention in the alternative. Plaintiffs Apple Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Google LLC, and Intel Corporation (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Andrei Iancu…