Fineman

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Fineman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20214:20-cv-00368California7,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 4:20-cv-00368-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART DEFENDANT DAVID FINEMAN’S

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE

DAVID FINEMAN, COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 24

DAVID FINEMAN, Counterclaimant, 11 v.

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Counter-Defendant.

15 Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”) brings this action against defendant David Fineman, asserting three causes of actions: (1) declaratory judgment as to the application of the “Conduct Exclusion”; (2) declaratory judgment as to the application of the “Bodily Injury Exclusion”; and (3) declaratory judgment as to “Uncovered Loss”. (Dkt. No. 1.) Fineman has counterclaimed, asserting two causes of action: (1) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (2) breach of contract. (Dkt. No. 20.) Now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.