In Re GEICO General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20214:19-cv-03768California1,394 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re GEICO General Insurance Company Case No. 19-cv-03768-HSG ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

SEAL

9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 92, 99, 103, 106, 110 10 11 12 Pending before the Court are the parties’ motions to file under seal portions of their class 13 certification briefs and associated exhibits. Dkt. Nos. 92, 99, 103, 106, 110. For the reasons 14 detailed below, the Court DENIES the motions to file under seal.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

16 Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal 17 documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana 18 v.City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the 19 common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records 20 and documents.’” Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). “[A] strong presumption in favor of 21 access is the starting point.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quotations omitted). To overcome this 22 strong presumption,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.