Johnson v. Reimal Family Limited Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-01192-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS ADA CLAIM AS MOOT AND

GRANTING PARTIAL MOTION FOR

REIMAL FAMILY LIMITED SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING PARTNERSHIP, et al., UNRUH ACT STATUTORY DAMAGES 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 28 12 INTRODUCTION Defendants Reimal Family Limited Partnership, Reimal Family Limited Partnership, and M. William Reimal (“defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiff Scott Johnson’s ADA claim under Rule 12(b)(1) as moot because they have fixed the issues Johnson identified. They also move for partial summary judgment to limit statutory damages on his Unruh Act claim to $4000 because it would be unreasonable to allow a veteran ADA plaintiff like Johnson to stack damages when he did not tell the property owners, nor the chiropractic office he was allegedly trying to access – which is open by appointment only 2-3 days a week – of…