Wright
Wright v. City Of Oakland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEMETRIUS A. WRIGHT, Case No. 20-cv-07068-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 21 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, a detainee, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate judge previously assigned to this case ordered service on one claim and dismissed the remaining claims with leave to amend. The case was reassigned to the undersigned and plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. Also pending is plaintiff’s motion to quash a subpoena and plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration.1 DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be…