Comin

Comin v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20213:19-cv-07261California3,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK COMIN, Case No. 19-cv-07261-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 24 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM),

11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Comin has sued his former employer, defendant International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), on behalf of a putative class under California Labor Code Section 2751 and the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and for breach of contract. Dkt. No. 23. Comin alleges that IBM had a practice of not providing sales representatives with a written contract about commissions, which Section 2751 requires, and failing to pay commissions as they came due. IBM asks to dismiss the Labor Code and UCL claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to strike the class definition as overbroad under Rule 12(f), to dismiss or strike Comin’s prayer for injunctive and declaratory relief for lack of standing under Rule 12(b)(1), and to strike Comin’s demand for a jury trial on the UCL claim. Dkt. No. 24. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.