In re FASTLY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20214:20-cv-06024California4,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re FASTLY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 20-cv-06024-PJH

ORDER APPOINTING ANDREW This Document Relates To: ZENOFF AS LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING LEAD COUNSEL

ALL ACTIONS.

Re: Dkt. Nos. 29, 30, 36, 42,

Before the court is movant Andrew Zenoff’s (“Zenoff”) motion to consolidate two related securities actions, Betancourt v. Fastly, Inc., 20-cv-6024-PJH and Habib v. Fastly, Inc., 20-cv-6454-PJH, appoint Zenoff as lead plaintiff in the consolidated action, and approve Robbins Geller Rudman Dowd LLP as lead counsel. Dkt. 42. Also before the court is movants Ramiro Pineda’s and William Feit’s (“P&F”) competing motion to consolidate the above actions, appoint P&F as lead plaintiffs, and approve Bragar, Eagel & Squire, P.C. as lead counsel. Dkt. 48. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.