Perryman

Perryman v. City of Pittsburg

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20213:20-cv-03408California3,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRENELL PERRYMAN, Case No. 20-cv-03408-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF

CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al., PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 28 12 On February 5, 2021, the Court held a hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss portions of plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 36. Having considered the arguments made and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendant’s motion to dismiss. 17 BACKGROUND I. Factual Background Plaintiff Trenell Perryman alleges that, on April 26, 2019, plaintiff was driving his twelve- year-old son to school in Pittsburg, CA when plaintiff’s vehicle ran out of gas. First Amended Compl. (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 24, ¶ 21. Plaintiff walked to the gas station to buy gasoline while his son remained in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.