Williams v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20213:19-cv-04700California500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ANDREA M WILLIAMS, et al., Case No. 19-CV-04700-LHK

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX

PARTE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

v. OF TIME AND MOTION TO FILE

DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL

APPLE, INC., Dkt. Nos. 86, 87 Defendant. 17 On February 8, 2021, Plaintiffs filed an emergency ex parte request for extension of time to file their class certification reply, ECF No. 86 (“ex parte request”), and an accompanying administrative motion to file a document under seal, ECF No. 87. Plaintiffs argue that because an exhibit to Defendant’s class certification opposition bears the wrong Bates number, Defendant should have to file a corrected opposition, and Plaintiffs should have a week to file their reply to that corrected opposition. ECF No. 86 at 1, 4. February 12, 2021 is the current deadline for Plaintiffs’ reply in support of class certification. On February 10, 2021, Defendant filed an opposition to Plaintiffs’ ex…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.