Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20215:16-cv-01120California4,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

1 A. Factual Background 2 1. The Parties 3 Defendant ISM Vuzem d.o.o. is a Slovenian business entity with its principle place of business 4 in Slovenia. Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 269, at ¶ 9 (“TAC”). Defendant ISM Vuzem USA, 5 Inc. is a South Carolina corporation with its principle place of business in South Carolina. Id. at ¶ 12. 6 Defendant Vuzem USA, Inc. is a California corporation with its principle place of business in 7 California. Id. at ¶ 13. Defendant Robert Vuzem is a resident of Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 10. Defendant Ivan 8 Vuzem is a resident of Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 11. Defendant HRID-MONT d.o.o. is a Slovenian 9 corporation with its principle place of business in Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 14. Defendant Gregurec Ltd is an 10 English business entity with its principle place of business in England. Id. at ¶ 18. Defendant LB 11 Metal d.o.o. is a Slovenian corporation with its principle place of business in Slovenia. Id. at ¶ 32. 12 Defendant Mos Servis d.o.o. is a Slovenian corporation with its principle place of business in Slovenia. 13 Id. at ¶ 44. Defendant Magna, d.o.o. is a Slovenian corporation with its principle place of business in 14…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.