Saunders

Saunders v. Doordash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20214:20-cv-05825California3,498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN SAUNDERS, Case No. 20-cv-05825-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION v. TO REMAND

DOORDASH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

This is a putative class action alleging state law wage and hour claims on behalf of drivers who use Defendant DoorDash Inc.’s platform to make deliveries for DoorDash’s customers. The case was initially filed in San Francisco County Superior Court. [Docket No. 1-2, Declaration of Joshua Lipshutz (“Lipshutz Decl.”), Ex. C (“Compl.”).] On August 18, 2020, DoorDash removed the case, asserting that federal jurisdiction exists under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). [Docket No. 1, Notice of Removal.] Plaintiff and putative class representative Kevin Saunders filed a first amended complaint on September 14, 2020. [Docket No. 18 (“FAC”).] Plaintiff now moves for remand. [Docket Nos. 21 (“Mot.”), 27 (“Reply”).] The court held a hearing on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.