V.Y.

V.Y. v. Instant Brands, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20213:20-cv-01084California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 V.Y., Case No. 20-cv-01084-MMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY

v. LETTER

INSTANT BRANDS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendant.

The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief on January 22, 2021 in which Plaintiff V.Y. moves to compel Defendant Instant Brands, Inc. to provide additional documents in response to Plaintiff’s request for production (“RFP”) no. 1 and to serve complete responses to six interrogatories. [Docket No. 38.] The discovery letter brief is granted in part and denied in part, without prejudice, as follows. RFP no. 1 asks Defendant to produce “documents relating to the design, manufacture, testing, and quality control of the instant unit” that are in its “possession, custody or control.” Jt. Letter Ex. 1 at ECF pp. 2-3. Plaintiff argues that Defendant has failed to produce responsive documents that it identified in its initial disclosures. Jt. Letter 2. In response,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.