Escalante

Escalante v. San Francisco Community College District, and Board of Trustees

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20214:18-cv-05562California2,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAROLYN ESCALANTE, Case No. 18-cv-05562-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 119, 120 SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY

COLLEGE DISTRICT, AND BOARD OF

TRUSTEES, et al., Defendants. 13 Pending before the Court are the SEIU Defendants’1 and SFCCD Defendants’2 (collectively, “Defendants”) motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (Dkt. No. 118, “TAC”). Dkt. Nos. 119, 120. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss.4 18 19 20 1 The SEIU Defendants are: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021 and its affiliate City Chapter, Local 1021; Athena Steff, President of City College Chapter; and Karl A. Gamarra, Vice President of City College Chapter. TAC ¶¶ 24-26. 2 The SFCCD Defendants are: San Francisco Community College District (“District”); SFCCD’s Board of Trustees (“Board of Trustees”); Mark W. Rocha, Chancellor; Dianna R. Gonzales, Vice Chancellor; Steven Bruckman,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.