Austin v. Budget Rental Car, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE J. AUSTIN, Plaintiff, No. 3:20-cv-06229-WHA
v.
BUGDET RENTAL CAR, INC., et al., ORDER DISMISSING CASE,
VACATING HEARING, AND
Defendant.
DENYING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
20 INTRODUCTION In this breach of contract and insurance case against rental car companies and financial institutions, the magistrate judge granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the complaint, but offered leave to amend. The amended complaint still lacks federal subject-matter jurisdiction. The suit is DISMISSED. STATEMENT Pro se plaintiff George Austin filed the instant case in September 2020. His original breach of contract, the complaint tied Budget to “a very strange pattern of behavior,” allegedly masterminding incentivized stalking, one instance of stealing plaintiff’s car, and dangerous maneuvers by other drivers directed at plaintiff while on the highway.…