Cupp
Cupp v. Smith
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20214:20-cv-03456California6,008 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RONALD CUPP, Case No. 20-cv-03456-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING SONOMA
COUNTY’S MOTION TO DISMISS,
ANDREW SMITH, et al., STRIKING REFERENCES TO WICK
AS A DEFENDANT, AND GRANTING
Defendants. IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE SMITH'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Re: Dkt. Nos. 41,
Before the court is County of Sonoma’s (“Sonoma County”) and Tennis Wick’s (“Wick”) motion to dismiss. Dkt. 41. Also before the court is plaintiff Ronald Cupp’s (“plaintiff”) motion to strike certain affirmative defenses in defendant Andrew Smith’s (“Smith”) answer. Dkt. 47. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their argument and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS Sonoma County’s motion to dismiss, STRIKES any references in the first amended complaint (“FAC”) to Wick as a defendant, and GRANTS IN…