Carl Washington v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20214:15-cv-03504California4,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CHRISTOPHER CORCORAN, ET AL., CASE NO. 15-cv-03504-YGR

Plaintiffs, PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 1 RE: MOTIONS

vs. Re: Dkt. Nos. 433, 438, 440 CVS PHARMACY, INC.,

Defendant.

The Court, having considered the pending motions in limine submitted by plaintiffs and defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“CVS”) HEREBY ORDERS as follows: A. Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine No. 1 is Denied. Plaintiff moves for an order that defendant not elicit testimony from, or otherwise present evidence or argument regarding, six former pharmacy benefit manager (“PBM”) employees (Joseph Zavalishin, Michael Reichardt, Franceen Spadaccino, William Strein, Cal Corum, and William Barre) and a current PBM employee (Amber Compton) regarding the “usual and customary” (“U&C”) terms in the five CVS-PBM agreements at issue in this case (the “PBM agreements”) and further that defendant not present evidence or argument that the PBMs “were not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.