Nichols

Nichols v. AARP, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20213:20-cv-06616California1,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEREMY NICHOLS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06616-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS

UNDER SEAL

AARP, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 41, 46 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are the parties’ administrative motions to file documents under seal.1 (Dkt. Nos. 31, 41, 46.) Defendants seek to file under seal excerpts of their motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, the motion’s supporting declarations and their attached exhibits, as well as excerpts of the reply brief. (Dkt. Nos. 31 & 46.) Plaintiffs seek to file under seal excerpts of the opposition, its supporting declaration and attached exhibits. (Dkt. No. 41.) After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, the Court rules as set forth below. DISCUSSION I. Legal Standard There is a presumption of public access to judicial records and documents. Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.