Bell v. Warden FCI Dublin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20215:17-cv-07346California9,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ROBERTA RONIQUE BELL, Case No. 17-CV-07346-LHK

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER

v. 28 U.S.C. § 2241

WARDEN FCI DUBLIN, Re: Dkt. No. 1 Respondent. 17 Before the Court is Petitioner Roberta Ronique Bell’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1 (“Petition”). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES the instant Petition. I. OVERVIEW This Order’s legal analysis is interwoven with a lengthy and complex procedural history. Thus, the Court provides an overview of the history and the issues in this case. In 1992, Petitioner Roberta Ronique Bell (“Petitioner”)—and her federal co-defendant Willie Tyler—beat, stabbed, and killed Doreen Proctor by shooting her in the chest and head. Petitioner and Willie Tyler killed Proctor on the morning Proctor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.