Alexander

Alexander v. The City of Brisbane Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20213:20-cv-04563California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OLGA ALEXANDER, Case No. 20-cv-04563-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT

v. OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM;

EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

THE CITY OF BRISBANE INC., et al., ON BRISBANE DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT

12 The Court issues this order to address two case management issues. First, pro se plaintiff Olga Alexander brought this case on behalf of herself and her minor twins, T.A. and V.A., against the City of Brisbane and four Brisbane police officers (“Brisbane Defendants”), and Timothy Alexander, Ms. Alexander’s husband and T.A.’s and V.A.’s father.1 ECF No. 20 (“FAC”). The Court previously deferred ruling on Ms. Alexander’s July 2020 application to be appointed as guardian ad litem for T.A. and V.A., explaining that:

Plaintiff may appear pro se on her own behalf, but as a non-attorney, she “has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.