Lee v. Admiral Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20213:20-cv-07053California649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIMOTHY HUNT LEE, Case No. 20-cv-07053-AGT

Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE, GRANTING LEAVE

v. TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT, TERMINATING

CLEAR BLUE SPECIALTY INSURANCE DEFENDANT BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT Defendants.

On December 23, 2020, defendant Berkley Insurance Company (“Berkley”) filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff did not file a timely opposition and instead, on January 12, 2021, plaintiff filed a purported second amended complaint, ECF No. 23, without leave of court or written consent from the opposing parties as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). Berkley objected to the second amended complaint, ECF No. 24, and on January 20, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the second amended complaint should not be stricken for failure to comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.