Contreras

Contreras v. Gamboa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20215:20-cv-06206California850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNESTO M. CONTRERAS,

Case No. 20-06206 BLF (PR) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v.

ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a California inmate, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state conviction in Santa Clara County 19 Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner requested a stay to exhaust a new claim involving 20 a polygraph test in state court, which the Court denied without prejudice to filing a 21 renewed motion for a stay that satisfied the factors under Rhines v .Weber, 544 U.S. 269 22 (2005). Dkt. No. 7. Petitioner was advised that if he failed to file a renewed motion in the 23 time provided, the matter would proceed on the cognizable claims. Id. at 2. The time for 24 filing a renewed motion has passed with no response from Petitioner. Accordingly, this 25 matter will proceed on the exhausted claims identified below. 26 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.