Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TORIANO GERMAINE HUDSON, Case No. 19-cv-07490-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING POST-JUDGMENT

v. REQUEST TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Defendants.

12 This action was dismissed on July 10, 2020 because, among other things, plaintiff failed to state a claim that the restrictions on his family visits violated a state regulation and the federal constitution, failed to state a claim for an equal protection violation, and any claim for religious interference could not proceed because plaintiff had not exhausted administrative remedies for any religion claim. The court explained that “this is the rare case where dismissal is proper because a plaintiff’s filings show that he has not exhausted administrative remedies for the claim he asserts.” Docket No. 14 at 4. A few weeks after the action was dismissed, plaintiff filed a request for an extension to file an amended complaint and later submitted…