Eacret

Eacret v. Crunch, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20214:18-cv-04374-JSTCalifornia1,646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 DYLAN EACRET, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04374-JST (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 76, 80 CRUNCH, LLC, Defendant.

13 On January 29, 2021, in contravention of the relevant provision of the undersigned’s General Standing Order, Plaintiffs unilaterally filed a discovery dispute letter brief (dkt. 76) rather than filing a request for a telephone conference. See Gen. Standing Order ¶ 13(b). In light of Plaintiffs’ failure to adhere to the strictures of that General Standing Order, the court ordered the parties to meet and confer forthwith, and then to jointly file a conforming letter brief. See Order of January 31, 2021 (dkt. 77). Thereafter, on February 5, 2021, the parties jointly filed their letter brief, through which Plaintiffs now seek to compel Defendant to immediately send contact information for putative class members to a third party administrator such that appropriate notices can be mailed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.