Tamrat

Tamrat v. Marlowe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20214:20-cv-07623California1,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HERMAN TAMRAT, Case No. 20-cv-07623-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

SONOMA COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY'S ADMINISTRATION, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court screened the original complaint and found that plaintiff had stated an excessive force claim against defendants Marlowe and Tamayo but dismissed the remaining claims and defendants with leave to amend. Plaintiff was informed that he could file an amended complaint to present additional allegations or he could continue solely on the excessive force claim against defendants Marlowe and Tamayo. The time to amend had passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. CONCLUSION 1. All claims and defendants are dismissed with prejudice except the excessive force claim against defendants Marlowe and Tamayo as discussed in the court’s prior order (Docket No. 8). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.