EIDMANN
EIDMANN v. WALGREEN CO.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
CAMERON EIDMANN,
Case No. 5:20-cv-04805-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS 10 WALGREEN CO., Re: Dkt. No. 30 11 Defendant.
In this putative class action, Plaintiff Cameron Eidmann (“Eidmann”) alleges the marketing of Defendant Walgreen Co.’s (“Walgreens”) Infants’ Pain & Fever Acetaminophen is false and misleading and violates California consumer protection statutes. Presently before the Court is Walgreens’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The Court finds it appropriate to take this motion under submission for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, Walgreens’ motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Walgreens is a national drugstore chain that sells brand-name products, as well as Walgreens-branded products, known as “private label” products. Dkt.…