Danko
Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. v. Danko
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CATLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01345-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STRIKE AND GRANTING IN PART
v. AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS
DANKO MEREDITH, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Danko Meredith’s motion to strike and motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 21. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion to strike and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Catlin Insurance Company, Inc. filed this action on February 21, 2020, to recover a duplicative settlement payment. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint. See Dkt. No. 14 (“FAC”). Plaintiff alleges that it inadvertently made two settlement payments in connection with an underlying lawsuit in…