Crosby

Crosby v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20213:20-cv-08529California1,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATHY CROSBY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08529-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE;

AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., AMEND; CONTINUING INITIAL CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants County of Alameda (“the County”) and County of Alameda Officer Henderson’s (“Henderson”) (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) Motion, filed January 4, 2021, “to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Strike Plaintiffs’ Complaint.”1 Plaintiffs Kathy Crosby (“Crosby”) and C.C. have filed opposition, to which Moving Defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows:2 1. The First and Second Causes of Action, titled, respectively, “Fourteenth Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983[;] Violation of Christopher Crosby’s Substantive Due Process Rights” and “Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.