Ocampo
Ocampo v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
JUSTIN OCAMPO,
Case No. 5:20-cv-05857-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO STRIKE 10 APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27 11 Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Strike (“Mot.”) Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Dkt. No. 27. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Strike the Second Amended Complaint. I. BACKGROUND On August 19, 2020, Plaintiff Ocampo, then the sole plaintiff in the matter, filed his initial putative class action complaint for damages alleging causes of action for violations of various consumer fraud and advertising laws. Thereafter, the Parties stipulated that Defendant’s response to or motion to dismiss the original complaint would be due no later than October 26, 2020. See Dkt. No. 13. On October 22, 2020, Plaintiffs’ counsel informed…