Poorsina
Poorsina v. Peak Forclosure Services, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 20-cv-08282-WHO Plaintiff,
ORDER RE ALI POORSINA’S
Vv. OPPOSITION TO ORDER
DISMISSING CASE
PEAK FORCLOSURE SERVICES, INC, Re: Dkt. No. 23 ll Defendant.
On January 29, 2021, I granted defendant Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc.’s (“Peak”)
14 |] motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Ali Poorsina’s Complaint with prejudice. [Dkt. No. 21].
Judgment was entered and the matter was closed. [Dkt. No. 22]. On February 11, 2021, Poorsina A 16 || filed another opposition to Peak’s motion to dismiss, reiterating arguments addressed and rejected
17 || inmy January 29, 2021 order. [Dkt. No. 23]. To the extent that Poorsina’s filing can be construed as a motion for reconsideration, it is DENIED. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) permits a district court to reconsider and amend a previous order under certain circumstances, none of which || exist here. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J,…