Stuckey

Stuckey v. Howard

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20214:19-cv-03691California685 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,

Case No. 19-cv-03691-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER REOPENING ACTION; v. LIFTING STAY; AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

D. HOWARD, et al.,

7 Defendants.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging various violations of his federal civil rights against several PBSP officials. In an Order dated December 8, 2020, the Court granted Defendants’ attorney request to refer this action and Plaintiff’s other pending matters to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program and to stay these cases pending global settlement proceedings. Dkt. 44. The Order stated that, if necessary, the Court will issue a further briefing scheduling after the settlement proceedings. On February 11, 2021, the Honorable Judge Robert M. Illman notified the Court that the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.