Julian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER JULIAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02857-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

TTE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Docket No. 66 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiffs are four individual consumers. They have filed a class action against Defendant TTE Technology, Inc., alleging that the company engaged in false advertising with respect to its televisions. Previously, the Court granted in part and denied in part TTE’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (“FAC”) and gave Plaintiffs limited leave to amend. Plaintiffs have since filed their second amended complaint (“SAC”) and TTE now challenges the SAC with another motion to dismiss. This is the motion currently pending before the Court. Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS TTE’s motion. However, the Court shall give Plaintiffs …