Martin

Martin v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20214:19-cv-06585-DMRCalifornia2,853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIMBERLY M.,

Case No. 19-cv-06585-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Defendant.

Plaintiff Kimberly M. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 16 (“Pltf. Mot.”), 18 (“Reply”).] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 17 (“Def. Mot.”).] For the reasons stated below, the court grants Plaintiff’s motion, denies the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remands this case for further proceedings. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits on October 29,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.