Cameron

Cameron v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20214:19-cv-03074California2,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONALD R. CAMERON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-03074-YGR (TSH)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

v. SANCTIONS

APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 230 Defendant.

12 Apple filed a motion for sanctions concerning the public disclosure of some of its allegedly confidential information by Benjamin Siegel, one of the counsel for the Developer Plaintiffs in this action. ECF No. 230. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, ECF No. 253, and Apple filed a reply. ECF No. 270. The Court heard oral argument on March 4, 2021, and now issues the following order. I. BACKGROUND A. The Protective Order On January 9, 2020, the Court entered the parties’ stipulated Protective Order. ECF No. 85. It sets forth different categories of confidential materials, including “CONFIDENTIAL” and “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Id. §§ 2.2, 2.8. A party that receives information designated by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.