Montanocordoba

Montanocordoba v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20214:18-cv-05682California11,245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANEASHA MONTANOCORDOBA, Case No. 18-cv-05682-PJH

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SHIRAISHI'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. AND GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART CONTRA COSTA

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al., COUNTY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 64, 67, 71

Defendants Contra Costa County’s (the “County”) and Detective Ann Shiraishi’s (“Shiraishi”) (collectively, “defendants”) respective motions for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on February 4, 2021. Plaintiff Daneasha Montanocordoba (“plaintiff”) appeared through her counsel, Christopher S. Patterson and Michael L. Fox. The County appeared through its counsel, Patrick L. Hurley. Shiraishi appeared through her counsel, Noah G. Blechman. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.