Doe
Doe v. United Behavioral Health
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 4:19-cv-07316-YGR
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 48, 53
13 Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under a pseudonym and as a representative for her minor son, John Doe, brings this action against defendants United Behavioral Health and United Healthcare Services, Inc. (collectively “United Health”). Doe maintains two causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a)(3), against United Health in its role as a third-party administrator and claims administrator of an employer-funded health plan. Now before the Court are the following motions: (1) Doe’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 48); and (2)…