Doe

Doe v. United Behavioral Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20214:19-cv-07316California6,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 4:19-cv-07316-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 48, 53

13 Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under a pseudonym and as a representative for her minor son, John Doe, brings this action against defendants United Behavioral Health and United Healthcare Services, Inc. (collectively “United Health”). Doe maintains two causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. section 1132(a)(3), against United Health in its role as a third-party administrator and claims administrator of an employer-funded health plan. Now before the Court are the following motions: (1) Doe’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 48); and (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.