Intuit Inc. v. Visa Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20213:21-cv-01234California362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: PAYMENT CARD INTERCHANGE FEE

AND MERCHANT DISCOUNT ANTITRUST

LITIGATION MDL No. 1720

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —33)

On October 19, 2005, the Panel transferred 14 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 398 F.Supp.2d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2005). Since that time, 56 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Margo K. Brodie. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of New York and assigned to Judge Brodie. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of New York for the reasons stated in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.