Amy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

“AMY,” et al., Case No. 19-cv-02184-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

RANDALL STEVEN CURTIS, NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER

OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 163

13 Before the court is defendant’s motion for relief from nondispositive pretrial order of magistrate judge. Dkt. 163. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. I. Background Fact discovery in this case closed on October 29, 2020. Dkt. 87. Defendant served discovery requests on that same day, seeking an interrogatory response and production of documents from plaintiffs. Plaintiffs did not serve responses to these discovery requests. The parties filed a joint discovery letter on February 10, 2021. Dkt. 160. Through the discovery letter, defendant sought to compel…