Nguyen

Nguyen v. Pelosi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20215:20-cv-08755California477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12 MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN, Case No. 20-CV-08755-LHK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

RECONSIDER APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

NANCY PELOSI, Speaker of the United Re: Dkt. No. 7 States House of Representatives, and MITCH MCCONNELL, Minority Leader of the United States Senate, Defendants. 19 On January 11, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 ECF No. 5. The Court held both that Plaintiff had failed to show poverty and that “Plaintiff’s 21 inscrutable pro se complaint against Speaker Pelosi and Senator McConnell is frivolous.” Id. at 2. 22 On January 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to reconsider her application to proceed in 23 forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint on January 19, 2021. ECF 24 No. 6. 25 The amended complaint is still frivolous. It makes essentially only two changes to the 26 original complaint. First, the amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.