Ramirez

Ramirez v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20215:20-cv-05672California2,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 KEVIN RAMIREZ, on His Own Behalf and Case No. 20-cv-05672-BLF on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL v. ARBITRATION 9 ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., [Re: ECF 22] 10 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Kevin Ramirez (“Ramirez” or “Plaintiff”) brings this putative class action against 13 Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA” or “Defendant”) alleging that the Ultimate Team Packs feature of EA’s video games violates California gambling law. See Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 8, ECF 1. Before this Court is EA’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. See Mot. to Compel Arbitration 17 (“Mot.”), ECF 22. Ramirez filed his Opposition to EA’s Motion to Compel Arbitration on January 18 14, 2021. See Opp’n. to Mot. To Compel. (“Opp’n.”), ECF 39. EA filed a Reply to Ramirez’s 19 Opposition on February 11, 2021. See Reply to Opp’n. (“Reply”), ECF 42. The Court heard oral 20 arguments on February 25, 2021. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.