Handloser

Handloser v. HCL America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20215:19-cv-01242California8,502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

GREGORY HANDLOSER and CERAFIN Case No. 19-CV-01242-LHK CASTILLO, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR CLASS

CERTIFICATION

v.

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. and HCL

AMERICA, INC.,

17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs Gregory Handloser and Cerafin Castillo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendants HCL Technologies Ltd. and HCL America, Inc. (collectively, “HCL”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 40, at ¶ 2 (“SAC”). Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. ECF No. 163 (“Mot”). Having considered the parties’ 24 25 1 Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification contains a notice of motion paginated separately from the points and authorities in support of the motion. ECF No. 163, at v. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) provides that the notice of motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.