Abramowitz

Palantir Technologies Inc. v. Abramowitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20215:19-cv-06879California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., Case No. 19-cv-06879-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE

PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE

MARC L. ABRAMOWITZ, et al., JUDGE Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order of Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72-2. See Mot., ECF 150-5. Defendants challenge Judge Cousins’s denial of their motion to compel further document production in response to Defendants’ Requests for Production Nos. 12, 95, and 97-103. See id. Defendants argue that Judge Cousins’s finding that Defendants had not established the relevance and proportionality of their document requests was clearly erroneous and contrary to law. Mot. 1. Plaintiff filed an opposition brief, but under Civil Local Rule 72-2, “[u]nless otherwise ordered by the assigned District Judge, no response…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.