Padilla
Padilla v. Davies
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20214:17-cv-05007California956 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RONNIE PADILLA,
Case No. 17-cv-05007-DMR (PR) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT v. STAY; DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; KEN CLARK, Warden, CONTINUING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING Respondent. EXHAUSTION OF STATE COURT REMEDIES; AND DIRECTING
PETITIONER TO FILE QUARTERLY
STATUS REPORTS
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. 8. Thereafter, Petitioner requested a stay of the proceedings while he completed the process of exhausting his unexhausted claims in state court. Dkt. 10 at 5. Petitioner admitted that his petition contained one exhausted claim (i.e., “Ground/Claim #1 in federal writ petition”) as well as “unexhausted claims that have not been exhausted before the …