Padilla

Padilla v. Davies

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20214:17-cv-05007California956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONNIE PADILLA,

Case No. 17-cv-05007-DMR (PR) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT v. STAY; DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; KEN CLARK, Warden, CONTINUING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING Respondent. EXHAUSTION OF STATE COURT REMEDIES; AND DIRECTING

PETITIONER TO FILE QUARTERLY

STATUS REPORTS

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. 8. Thereafter, Petitioner requested a stay of the proceedings while he completed the process of exhausting his unexhausted claims in state court. Dkt. 10 at 5. Petitioner admitted that his petition contained one exhausted claim (i.e., “Ground/Claim #1 in federal writ petition”) as well as “unexhausted claims that have not been exhausted before the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.