Sidibe
Sidibe v. Sutter Health
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division DJENEBA SIDIBE, et al., Case No. 12-cv-04854-LB
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING SUTTER’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. FOR 2008 TO 2010 AND FOR THE §
CLAIMS AND OTHERWISE DENYING
SUTTER HEALTH, THE MOTION Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 838 and 838-1 16 INTRODUCTION In this certified class action, the named plaintiffs — four persons who paid for health insurance and two companies who paid for health insurance for their employees — challenge Sutter Health’s allegedly anticompetitive practices as (1) unlawful tying and an unlawful course of conduct in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act § 1 and California’s Cartwright Act, (2) monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of the Sherman Act § 2, and (3) a violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The plaintiffs allege that through its contracts with…