LD

LD v. United Behavioral Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20214:20-cv-02254California4,762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:20-cv-02254 YGR LD, ET AL.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs, v. Re: Dkt. No.

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL.,

10 Defendants.

Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against defendants United Behavioral Health (“United”) and MultiPlan, Inc. (“MultiPlan”) for claims arising out of United’s alleged failure to reimburse their claims for Intensive Outpatient Program (“IOP”) services at the Usual, Customary, and Reasonable Rate (“UCR”) that non-party Summit Estate, Inc. provided to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ conduct caused them injury, because it forced them to pay any amounts that United failed to reimburse for the IOP services. After the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), with leave to amend, plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), in which they assert, on their own behalf and on behalf of a proposed class of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.