Wilson
Wilson v. Valdez-Perner
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 DAVID W. WILSON, No. C 20-4801 WHA (PR) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL v.
VALDEZ-PERNER; K. ROYAL; L.
KIRBY; J. RISENHOOVER; B.
CHACER; E. ENOS; D.
THORNBERG; JIM ROBERTSON;
M. HODGES; M. VOONG; C.
MUNOZ; R. TOLSON; M. GIORGI, Defendants. / 16 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a California prisoner who filed this pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials and a state court judge for violating his constitutional rights. For the reasons discussed below, certain claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, and the complaint is ordered served upon certain defendants Vasquez based upon plaintiff’s cognizable claim. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. ANALYSIS A. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which a plaintiff seeks to…