Thornton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS THORNTON, Case No. 19-cv-07638-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 21, 22, 28, 43 DALY CITY, et al., Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. Nos. 18, 21, 22, 28, 43. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART the motions to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND The FAC alleges the following facts. Plaintiff’s childhood friend, Joshua Godinez, worked at Gate Gourmet, and Plaintiff “observed” that Godinez would “be held” at work “for longer than he intended” and “complain[ed] of receiving no payment.” FAC ¶¶ 34, 38-39. Plaintiff later inquired about employment at Gate Gourmet, was hired in July 2018, and was “assigned to work in a freezer manufacturing…