Young

Young v. Chao

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20213:19-cv-01411California11,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYL YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-01411-JCS

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

PETER BUTTIGIEG, Re: Dkt. No. 45 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cheryl Young, pro se, brings this action asserting that Defendant Peter Buttigieg,1 in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation (the “Secretary”), discriminated against her based on race and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), respectively. After the Ninth Circuit reversed a previous order of dismissal based on the statute of limitations, Ms. Young filed her operative second amended complaint, and the Secretary moves once again to dismiss all of Ms. Young’s claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court held a hearing on Friday, March 12, 2021. For the reasons explained below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.