Shiheiber

Shiheiber v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20213:21-cv-00609California938 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IBRAHIM NIMER SHIHEIBER,

Case No. 21-cv-00609-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING APRIL 23, 2021 CASE SFPD, et al., MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 10 Defendants.

12 Having granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court is required to review Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine whether any claims are subject to dismissal on the basis that they: (1) are frivolous or malicious; (2) fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Marks v. Solcum, 98 F.3d 494, 495 (9th Cir. 1996). Here, Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he was unlawfully searched, detained and subjected to excessive force in violation of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fourth Amendment. He names as a defendant San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.